<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>پژوهشکده حقوق و قانون ایران</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>فصلنامه تحقیق و توسعه در حقوق تطبیقی</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2981-1805</Issn>
				<Volume>7</Volume>
				<Issue>22</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2024</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>21</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The Basis of Civil Liability for Service Providers in Islamic Law and Its Comparison with French, American, and European Union Law</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>The Basis of Civil Liability for Service Providers in Islamic Law and Its Comparison with French, American, and European Union Law</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>131</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>162</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">714253</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22034/law.2024.2018880.1285</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mohammad Hadi</FirstName>
					<LastName>Javaherkalam</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor of Private Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Allameh Tabatabai University</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0001-8236-5406</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Ahmad</FirstName>
					<LastName>Ghanavizchi</LastName>
<Affiliation>PhD Student in international law at Angers (France) and Geneva (Switzerland) universities</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2024</Year>
					<Month>05</Month>
					<Day>20</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>&lt;span lang=&quot;EN&quot;&gt;The foundation of civil liability for service providers is not uniformly interpreted across different legal systems. In Imami jurisprudence the narrations indicate that the Sacred Lawgiver, to enhance caution in service provision and protect victims, has established a presumption of liability for service providers placing the burden of proof for exoneration on them, or at the very least, presuming their fault in liability arising from causation, obligating them to prove the absence of fault. This solution is also suggested to be accepted in Maliki jurisprudence specifically for craftsmen, although there is contrary opinion. In Hanafi and Hanbali jurisprudence, the liability of a common hireling is based on &quot;destruction,&quot; whereas in Shafi&#039;i jurisprudence, the presumption of non-liability is stronger. In European countries the 1991 European Commission proposal envisaged a presumption of fault for service providers, placing the burden of proving the absence of fault on the service provider, although this was not enacted due to member states&#039; disagreements.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, there is a tendency to facilitate the proof of their fault. Therefore, as specified in the comprehensive research conducted in 2004 commissioned by the European Commission and accepted by the judicial practice of France, the United States, and the European Court of Justice, the liability of service providers is based on fault, and the burden of proof lies with the &quot;consumer.&quot; Consequently, the solution accepted in Imami jurisprudence, for the aforementioned reasons, is preferred over the solutions established in the other legal systems studied, and it is proposed that the global community should also adopt this approach.&lt;br /&gt; </Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">&lt;span lang=&quot;EN&quot;&gt;The foundation of civil liability for service providers is not uniformly interpreted across different legal systems. In Imami jurisprudence the narrations indicate that the Sacred Lawgiver, to enhance caution in service provision and protect victims, has established a presumption of liability for service providers placing the burden of proof for exoneration on them, or at the very least, presuming their fault in liability arising from causation, obligating them to prove the absence of fault. This solution is also suggested to be accepted in Maliki jurisprudence specifically for craftsmen, although there is contrary opinion. In Hanafi and Hanbali jurisprudence, the liability of a common hireling is based on &quot;destruction,&quot; whereas in Shafi&#039;i jurisprudence, the presumption of non-liability is stronger. In European countries the 1991 European Commission proposal envisaged a presumption of fault for service providers, placing the burden of proving the absence of fault on the service provider, although this was not enacted due to member states&#039; disagreements.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, there is a tendency to facilitate the proof of their fault. Therefore, as specified in the comprehensive research conducted in 2004 commissioned by the European Commission and accepted by the judicial practice of France, the United States, and the European Court of Justice, the liability of service providers is based on fault, and the burden of proof lies with the &quot;consumer.&quot; Consequently, the solution accepted in Imami jurisprudence, for the aforementioned reasons, is preferred over the solutions established in the other legal systems studied, and it is proposed that the global community should also adopt this approach.&lt;br /&gt; </OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Keywords: Service Providers</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">fault</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Strict Liability</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Presumption of Fault</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Presumption of Liability</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jcl.illrc.ac.ir/article_714253_fd002c67f7a2d1b8c000294b529c3236.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
