Journal of Research and Development in Comparative Law

Journal of Research and Development in Comparative Law

The Prosecutor's Activism in Court Proceedings: A Comparative Study of Iranian and French Law

Document Type : scientific research paper

Abstract
The Iranian Code of Criminal Procedure (ICCP) mandates the compulsory presence of the prosecutor or their representative in first-instance criminal courts (Court of Criminal 1), whereas it allows their participation to be discretionary in second-instance courts (Court of Criminal 2). However, the law fails to offer explicit and comprehensive guidelines on the specific role, scope, and manner of the prosecutor's involvement in these proceedings. This legal ambiguity has led to a situation where the prosecutor assumes a largely passive position, primarily focusing on appeals and cassation after the judgment has been rendered, rather than playing an active role in the trial phase. Such a limited engagement undermines the prosecutor's essential functions, including their supervisory role and active involvement in the fact-finding process, thereby restricting their influence to appellate stages alone.

In contrast, under French criminal procedural law, the prosecutor holds a more robust and active role in the judicial process. French law mandates the prosecutor's consistent and proactive presence in both trial and appellate phases of criminal cases. Furthermore, the prosecutor in France is not only involved in hearings but also plays a pivotal role in shaping criminal policy, engaging in close collaborations with judges, and providing guidance throughout the proceedings. The prosecutor’s involvement extends beyond merely representing the state’s interest; they are integral to the development of case law, the implementation of justice, and the formulation of public criminal policy. In this sense, the prosecutor is considered an essential figure in steering the criminal justice process and ensuring its alignment with the principles of fairness and legal integrity.

This article offers a comparative analysis of the role of the prosecutor in Iran and France, focusing on the disparities between the two systems in terms of prosecutorial engagement during criminal trials. It explores how the lack of continuous prosecutor involvement in Iranian trials, coupled with an overemphasis on post-verdict appeals, has resulted in a diminished role for the prosecutor in guiding the trial process. The article also examines the broader consequences of this limited role, particularly its impact on judicial independence and the effective administration of criminal justice. In conclusion, the article provides several recommendations for reforming the Iranian criminal justice system, with a specific focus on strengthening the prosecutor's role in the trial phase, in order to enhance the overall fairness, transparency, and efficiency of criminal proceedings.
Keywords

Subjects


1-    Bruschi, C. (Ed.). (2002). Parquet et politique pénale depuis le XIXème siècle (p. 6). Presses Universitaires de France. (in French)
 
 2-   Delage, P.-J. (2024). À propos de quelques évolutions de la procédure pénale issues de la loi « Justice » du 20 novembre 2023 (Loi no 2023-1059 du 20 novembre 2023 d'orientation et de programmation du ministère de la Justice 2023-2027). Revue de science criminelle et de droit pénal comparé, 2024(3). (in French)
 
3-    Delage, P.-J., Jeanne, N., & Parizot, R. (2021). Chronique de jurisprudence Procédure pénale. Revue de science criminelle et de droit pénal comparé, 2021(1), 1. (in French)
 
 4-   Milburn, P., Kostulski, K., & Salas, D. (2010). Les procureurs : Entre vocation judiciaire et fonctions politiques (p. 10). Presses Universitaires de France. (in French)
 
  5-  Pradel, J. D., & Guerin. (2010). Les relations entre le ministère public et le ministre de la Justice dans l’avant-projet de réforme de la procédure pénale. D., 2010, 660. (in French)
 
6-    Robert, M. (2016). L’évolution des politiques pénales et des rapports entre la chancellerie et les parquets. Les Cahiers de la Justice, 1(1), 75. (in French)
 
 7-   Vergès, E. (2013). Politique pénale et action publique : la difficile conciliation du modèle français de ministère public et des standards européens. Revue de science criminelle et de droit pénal comparé, 3(3), 605. (in French)
 
8-    Vonderscher, J. (2023). Réussites et écueils d’une politique pénale, l’exemple de la réforme prioritaire liée au développement du travail d’intérêt général. Archives de politique criminelle, 2023(1), 45. (in French)
 
  9-  Jeanne, N. (2021). Un nouveau pouvoir propre du procureur de la République, la mise en place, dans l’enquête, d’une vidéosurveillance de la voie publique. RSC, 2021. (in French)
 
   10- Rostami, H. (2023). Criminal Procedure Law (3rd ed.). Tehran: Mizan Publishing. (in Persian)
 
11- Lazerges, C. (2023). An Introduction to Criminal Policy (A. H. Najafi Abrandabadi, Trans.). Tehran: Mizan Publishing. (in Persian)
 
12-  Najafi Abrandabadi, A. H. (2013). An Introduction to Research in the Criminal Justice System: Opportunities and Challenges. In Research Essentials in the Criminal Justice System: Opportunities and Challenges – Collected Papers. Tehran: Mizan Publishing. (in Persian)
 
13-  Najafi Abrandabadi, A. H. (2016). Criminal Procedure: The Struggle Between Power–Security and Individual Rights and Freedoms. In Criminal Procedure: Foundations, Challenges, and Solutions – Proceedings of the National Conference on Criminal Procedure, Shahid Beheshti University Faculty of Law (December 2015). (in Persian)
 
  14- Najafi Abrandabadi, A. H. (2023). Criminology at the Dawn of the Third Millennium. In A. H. Najafi Abrandabadi & H. Hashem Beiki (Eds.), Criminology Encyclopedia. Tehran: Ganj-e Danesh Publishing. (in Persian)
 
  15-Najafi Abrandabadi, A. H. (2016). Globalization of Criminal Law and International Academic Cooperation. In B. Razavifard (Ed.), Aspects of French Criminal Law: Selected Lectures and Articles by Michel Massé and Bernadette Aubert. Tehran: Allameh Tabataba’i University Press. (in Persian)
 
Articles:
   16- Abbasi, A. (2019). Proof of the Actus Reus of Crimes Based on Expert Opinion. Judgment, 19(97), 23–47. (in Persian)
 
17-    Ebrahimi, S. (2004). The evolution of crime prevention policy in France in light of the legislative decree of 17 July 2002. The Judiciary's Law Journal, 68(48–49), 251–283. (in Persian)
 
18-    Ebrahimi, S. (2012). Just Rehabilitation of Offenders. Criminal Law Doctrines, 9(3), 151–176. (in Persian)
 
  19-  Fathpoor, S., Soltanfar, G., & Hooshiar, M. (2019). Criteria for determining the severity of crime in Iranian law. Political Sociology of Iran, 2(2), 365–385. https://doi.org/10.30510/psi.2022.345387.3537 (in Persian)
 
20-    Ghorchibegi, M. (2016). The Necessity of the Prosecutor's Presence in Court Sessions: From Mere Presence to Active Engagement. Quarterly Journal of Judicial Procedures, Criminal Law, Spring and Summer, 1, 21–28. (in Persian)
 
 21-   Jalali, A. R., & Maldar, M. (2022). Protection of Criminals’ Human Dignity in Sentencing Phase in Light of ECtHR Jurisprudence. Public Law Research, 24(76), 247–275. https://doi.org/10.22054/qjpl.2022.62688.2652 (in Persian)
 
   22- Moazenzadegan, H., & Rahdarpour, H. (2023). Transparency of Law Principle and its Position in the European Court of Human Rights Procedure and Iranian Criminal Law. The Quarterly Journal of Judicial Law Views, 23(81), 193–220. (in Persian)
23-Omranifar, A., Sheydaeian, M., Alipur, H. Establishment of the Step of Laying charges in Iranian Law with a Glance at English Law (from Requirements to Providing an Appropriate Model). Journal of Research and Development in Comparative Law, 2024; 7(24): 39-73. doi: 10.22034/law.2024.2035683.1415. (in Persian)
24-safaey, S. H., Darvishzadeh, M. (2024). 'Using Thematic Qualitative Analysis to Identify Predominant and Strong Judicial Policies in the Iranian Judicial System', Journal of Research and Development in Comparative Law, 7(22), pp. 7-15. doi: 10.22034/law.2024.714254. (in Persian)
 
 
25- tavakoli, O. (2022). 'Bangalore Principles on Judicial Behavior from the Perspective of Islamic Law', Journal of Research and Development in Comparative Law, 4(13), pp. 13-50. doi: 10.22034/law.2022.538727.1112. (in Persian).
 
   26- Najafi Abrandabadi, A. H. (2003). From classical criminal justice to restorative justice. Razavi University Journal of Theology and Law (Legal Teachings), 3(3–4, Fall–Winter). (in Persian)
 
27-    Najafi Abrandabadi, A. H. (2005). Criminal Law at the Dawn of the Third Millennium. In G. Fletcher, Basic Concepts of Criminal Law (S. M. Seyedzadeh Sani, Trans.). Mashhad: Razavi University of Islamic Sciences Press. (in Persian)
 
28-    Najafi Abrandabadi, A. H. (2023). From Criminal Policy to Criminal Justice Policy (Preface to the First Edition). In C. Lazerges, An Introduction to Criminal Policy (A. H. Najafi Abrandabadi, Trans.). Tehran: Mizan Publishing. (in Persian)
 
29-    Rahimi, Z., & Shakeri, A. (2020). Accompanied punishment; nature and manner in judicial proceedings. Criminal Law and Criminology Studies, 49(2), 419–448. https://doi.org/10.22059/jqclcs.2020.283356.1440 (in Persian)
 
30-    Rostami, H. (2024). Fair Criminal Proceedings in the Light of the Role of the Prosecutor (With an attitude to International Documents and Western law). Comparative Studies on Islamic and Western Law, Articles in Press. https://doi.org/10.22091/csiw.2024.11029.2567 (in Persian)
 
31-  Salehi, M., & Afrasiabi, A. (2019). Position and powers of prosecutor in criminal proceeding system. Journal of Criminal Law Research, 7(25). https://doi.org/10.22054/jclr.2018.12592.1220 (in Persian)
 
32-    Shamloo, B., & Gozli, M. (2011). The character file in Iranian and French criminal law. Criminal Law Doctrines, 8(2), 89–118. (in Persian)
 
33-    Vonderscher, J. (2023). Réussites et écueils d’une politique pénale, l’exemple de la réforme prioritaire liée au développement du travail d’intérêt général. Archives de politique criminelle, 2023(1), 45. (in French)

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 02 September 2025