Journal of Research and Development in Comparative Law

Journal of Research and Development in Comparative Law

Synergy of Intent and Recklessness in Forming a Novel Category of Murder: A Comparative Study under the Islamic Penal Code and the U.S. Criminal Justice System

Articles in Press

Document Type : scientific research paper

Authors
Hossein Aghaie-Nia 1
Aref Jafarian 2
Fatemeh Mohseni 1
Mahdi Evatvand 1
1 Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
2 Criminal Law and Criminology, Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
10.22034/law.2026.2087006.1773
Abstract
This study examines and analyzes the legal dimensions of the criminal judgments issued in Case No. 9209982103501067 (homicide resulting from intentional arson) and seeks to demonstrate how, in such conduct, the “synergy of intent and recklessness” may give rise to a novel category of intentional homicide. Based on the procedural background outlined in the introduction and relying on the criteria of the Islamic Penal Code, the analysis first addresses the absence of a direct intent to kill. Nevertheless, despite the lack of intent to kill (or intent to hit a specific target), the defendant’s conduct involved the creation of an extreme and gross risk to human life—one exceeding the threshold contemplated in the opening clause of paragraph (p) of Article 291. Consequently, the conduct falls within the regulatory scope concerning “creation of gross risk” and the requirement to establish “awareness and appreciation of severe danger.” Accordingly, although the conduct in question does not fall within the four subcategories of Article 290 of the 2013 Islamic Penal Code, it may—given the criterion set forth in the Note to Article 292 (requiring proof of awareness of severe danger)—be aligned with a form of intentional homicide that appears to be realized in this case. In the U.S. criminal justice system, by establishing two analogous elements—(extreme recklessness and awareness of risk)—the act under consideration is classified as “depraved heart murder” or “extreme recklessness murder,” which is categorized as second degree murder and is punishable by life imprisonment. Finally, considering the statutory and jurisprudential foundations governing the attribution of “intent” in Iranian law—and taking into account the distinct level of blameworthiness associated with this type of conduct compared to other forms of intentional homicide—it appears that reliance solely on qisās may not correspond proportionately to the actual gravity of the conduct. This suggests that legislative reform could help determine a more proportionate punishment for this model of “synergy between intent and recklessness.”
Keywords
Synergy of intent and recklessness
homicide resulting from intentional arson
Article 291 of the Islamic Penal Code
Note to Article 292 of the Islamic Penal Code
intentional homicide based on gross risk/extreme recklessness
depraved heart murder
Subjects
-Aghaie-Nia, H. (2016). Criminal Law, Crimes Against Persons. Tehran: Mizan (In Persian)
-Aghaie-Nia, H. (2023). Criminal Law, Crimes Against Persons. Tehran: Mizan (In Persian)
-Aghaie Nia, H. & Rostami. H. (2025). Islamic Penal Code, An Analytical Commentary. Tehran: Mizan (In Persian)
-Beck, A. (2021). “The Absurdity of the Illinois Felony-Murder Doctrine”. J. Legis., 48, 165.
-Binder, G. (2004). “The origins of American felony murder rules”. Stan. L. Rev., 57-59.
-Binder, G., Fissell, B., & Weisberg, R. (2016). “Capital punishment of unintentional felony murder”. Notre Dame L. Rev., 92, 1141.
-Cieslik, Jason M. (2022) “A New Approach to Felony Murder in Illinois’’. Northern Illinois University Law Review: Vol. 42: Iss. 2, Article 4.
-Cohen, G. B., Levinson, J. D., & Hioki, K. (2023). “Racial Bias, Accomplice Liability, and the Felony Murder Rule: A National Empirical Study”. Denv. L. Rev., 101, 65.
- Ghandnoosh, N., Stammen, E., & Budaci, C. (2022). “Felony murder: An on-ramp for extreme sentencing”. The Sentencing Project. 1.
-Gholāmi,H , Chāh Abi,G and Shahbāzi,M . (2017). “The Concept of Cause and it’s Requirements in Iranian Criminal Code 2014”. Judgment, 16(88), 49-71. (In Persian)
- Ghiyasi, J., & Akrami, R. (2015). “The Role of Awareness about the Typically Fatality of an Act in the Structure of Murder from the Viewpoints of Islamic and Western Law”. Comparative Studies on Islamic and Western Law, 1(2), 105-134. doi: 10.22091/csiw.2015.566 (In Persian)
- Ghiyasi, J., & Akrami, R. (2016). Causation In Criminal Laws. Tehran: Jungle. (In Persian)
- Ghiyasi, J. and Davari, M. (2016). “Analysis the Mental Element of Deliberate Homicide Caused by Conscious Recklessness”. Criminal Law and Policy, 1(2), 299-317. (In Persian)
-He, Z. (2024). “The Criminal Intent in American Criminal Law and its Special Provisions in Murder”. International Journal of Social Sciences and Public Administration, 2(3), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.62051/ijsspa.v2n3.01
-Hajidehabadi, A. (2019). “Changes in ‘Perpetration by Means’ Principle in the Light of Latest Legislative Developments in Iran (Article 526 of the Islamic Penal Code of 1392)”. Private Law, 16(1), 113-132. doi: 10.22059/jolt.2019.277883.1006702 (In Persian)
-Hajidehabadi, A. (2022). Crimes Against Persons (Homicide). Tehran: Mizan (In Persian)
-Kadish, S. H., Schulhofer, S. J., & Barkow, R. E. (2016). Criminal law and its processes: Cases and materials (10th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
- Khorram,S and Tavajohi,A . (2025). “Criterion and Instances of Criminal Negligence and its Foundations in Iranian Criminal Law”. Research and development in criminal law and criminology, 2(4), 216-253. doi: 10.22034/jclc.2025.2063213.1204 (In Persian)
-LaFave, W. R. (2000). Criminal law (Hornbook Series). West Group.
-Lafave W. R. (2009). Criminal Law (Causation, Homicide in U.S.). Translated by Aghaie Nia, H. (2010). Tehran: Mizan. (In Persian)
-Lafave W. R. (2017). Criminal Law (United States of America). Translated by Aghaie Nia, H. (2022). Tehran: Mizan. (In Persian)
-Lafave W. R. (2017). Criminal Law (United States of America). Translated by Aghaie Nia, H. (2022). Tehran: Mizan. (In Persian)
- M. Sadeghi, H. M. (2020). Offences Against Physical Integrity of Persons. Tehran: Mizan. (In Persian).
- M. Sadeghi, H. M. (2023). Criminal Law (General Part 2). Tehran: Dadgostar. (In Persian).
- Moradi, H. and Shahbazi, A. (2015). “Mens rea of Murder in the Islamic Penal Code (2012)”. Journal of Criminal Law Research, 4(13), 43-70. doi: 10.22054/jclr.2015.2397 (In Persian)
- Najafi, M. H. (Dateless). Jawahir al-Kalam fi Sharh Shara'i' al-Islam. Translated by: Na'ib Zadeh. A. (1984). Tehran: Khorsandi. (In Persian)
-Reed, A., & Bohlander, M. (Eds.). (2018). Homicide in criminal law: a research companion. Routledge.
- Rezaei rad, A. , Sayyahi, M. and Neshan, K. (2019). “A Comparative Study of the Use of the Term Cause and Words Close to it in the Four Sciences of Philosophy, Figh, Ow-Soul and Law”. Academic Journal of Knowledge and Research of Law, 5(1), 59-90. doi: 10.22055/ajkrl.2020.26418.1021 (In Persian)
- Rostami, H. & Shaabani Kandsari, H. (2016). “Obtaining of causal relationship in the premise of intervention of multiple factors on felonies and damages (According to the Islamic Penal Code in 1392)”. Journal of Criminal Law Research, 4(15), 144-171. doi: 10.22054/jclr.2016.4439 (In Persian)
-Sadeghi, M. (2014). “The accummulation the direct and indirect causes in the islamic penal cod 1392”. Journal of Legal Studies, 6(2), 97-123. doi: 10.22099/jls.2014.2359 (In Persian)
-Sheikholeslami,A and Hataminia,H . (2025). “Feasibility Study of Intentional and Unintentional Partnership of Perpetrators in a Crime with a Critique of the Judgment Issued by the Criminal Court of Khorasan Razavi Province and A Judgment Issued by Supreme Court”. The Journal of Critical Analysis of Judicial Decisions, 4(7), 208-252. doi: 10.22034/analysis.2025.2052916.1103
-Parvizi, S. , Davarnia, R. and Soleimani mola yusef, I. (2021). “Legal Jurisprudential Study of Murder Caused by Extreme Recklessness, Reflecting on the Judicial Procedure’s Iran”. Criminal Law Research, 12(2), 53-78. doi: 10.22124/jol.2021.17980.2016 (In Persian)
-State v. Glover. (1932). 330 MO. 709, 50 S.W.2d. 1049.
-State v. Leopold. (1929). 110 Conn. 55, 147 A. 118.
Journal of Research and Development in Comparative Law

Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript
Available Online from 08 July 2026