Journal of Research and Development in Comparative Law

Journal of Research and Development in Comparative Law

A Comparative Study of the Condition of Waiver of Certain Transactions in Joint Stock Companies in Iranian and French Law

Document Type : scientific research paper

Authors
1 Judge in Tehran
2 Assistant Professor, Islamic Azad University, Varamin Branch, PhD in Private Law
Abstract
One of the pillars of joint-stock companies, like other companies, is the company's managers. Their main duty is to maintain trust and respect the interests of all shareholders. In this regard, Articles 129 and 132 of the amended Commercial Law of 1347 regarding joint-stock companies prohibit the managers of these companies from conducting certain transactions with the company and also consider performance guarantees for conducting those transactions. Conducting transactions by managers with a joint-stock company can be considered one of the most important examples of the condition of waiving the right to conduct a transaction in part. The first example is the transactions of the members of the board of directors and the CEO of the company, as well as institutions and companies in which the members of the board of directors or the CEO of the company are partners or members of the board of directors or CEO, which is foreseen in Article 129 of the amended Commercial Law of 1347. The second example mentioned in the aforementioned law is the prohibition of obtaining loans or credit from the company and guaranteeing or committing the debts of the CEO and members of the board of directors by the company, which is mentioned in Article 132 of this law, and the third example is the execution of a similar transaction with the company by the directors and CEO that involves competition with the company's operations. We also see similar provisions in French law. The French legislator has also dedicated Articles L. 38-225 to 43-225 of the amended Commercial Code of 2001 to such transactions and their guarantees. Accordingly, the subject of this article is to analyze the nature of these conditions and their enforcement guarantees in the laws of the countries in question, and it addresses this issue using a library method and a comparative-analytical study.
Keywords
Subjects

1.       Amiri Ghaem-Maghami, A. (1976). Law of obligations. Tehran: University of Tehran. (in Persian)
2.       Constantin, A. (2019). Company Law. Paris: Dalloz. (in French)
3.       Didier, P. (2019). Commercial Law. Paris: Economica. (in French)
4.       Emami, S. (2007). Civil Law (in property, ownership, usufruct, easement, obligations in general, sale and exchange). Tehran: Islamiyeh. (in Persian)
5.       Eskini, R. (2006). Commercial Law: Commercial Companies. Tehran: Samt. (in Persian)
6.       Farahnakian, F. (2016). Commercial law in the current legal system. Tehran: Mizan. (in Persian)
7.       Gibirila, D. (2024). Company Law. Paris: Ellipses. (in French)
8.       Guyon, Y. (2003). Business Law. General Commercial Law and Companies. Paris: Economica. (in French)
9.       Habibi, M. (2003). Analytical Civil Law. Tehran: Mizan. (in Persian)
10.    Hassanzadeh, M. (2011). The effects of trust in the transactions of managers of commercial companies. Monthly magazine of the Bar Association. (in Persian)
11.    Jeantin, M. (1996). Company Law. Paris: Montchrestien. (in French)
12.    Johar, S. (2010). Commercial Companies Law. Tehran: Javedaneh. (in Persian)
13.    Magnier, V. (2019). Company Law. Paris: Dalloz. (in French)
14.    Messai-Bahri, S. (2005). The Civil Liability of Company Directors. Paris: Le Cannu. (in French)
15.    Mestre, J., & Velardoccchio, D. (2015). Commercial Companies. Paris: Lamy. (in French)
16.    Mohammadi, Ghasem, Javaher Kalam, Mohammad Hadi and Jamali, Morteza. (1401). The effect of "nullity" and "dissolution" of a contract on its condition; providing a rule for "independence of condition from contract" from the perspective of Islamic law and judicial practice. Quarterly Journal of Research and Development in Comparative Law, 5(17), 83-116. Doi:  10.22034/law.2021.533203.1088 (in Persian)
17.    Pasban, M. (2009). Commercial Companies Law. Tehran: Samt. (in Persian)
18.    Safaei, S., Ghasemzadeh, S. (2006). Civil law, individuals and disabled persons. Tehran: Samt. (in Persian)
19.    Salehi, N., Mehregan, B., Rezaei Foumani, A. (1403). A comparative study of the role and position of managers in joint-stock companies in Iranian and English law. Comparative research on jurisprudence, law and politics, 250-268. (in Persian)
20.    Saqri, M. (2014). Commercial law, companies. Tehran: Publishing Company. (in Persian)
21.    Shahidi, M. (2008). Civil Law 4 - Conditions in the Contract. Tehran: Majd. (in Persian)
22.    Soleimanzadeh, Samira. (1404). Legal personality, history, foundations and works, with emphasis on a comparative study of commercial companies in the Iranian legal system and written law (France and Germany). Quarterly Journal of Research and Development in Comparative Law, 8(26), 79-106. doi:  10.22034/law.2025.2045235.1480 (in Persian)
23.    Tafreshi, M., Asghari Aq-Mashadi, F. (2006). Legal nature of the relationship between joint-stock company managers and the company. Journal of the Faculty of Administrative Sciences and Economics. (in Persian)
24.    Vidal, D. (2010). Company Law. Paris: LGDJ. (in French)