In article 20 of the publication, the approaches that the journal intends to follow and the areas and branches of law in which research and development are going to be conducted are explained. One of the areas mentioned in that article was the "technological information impact on the legal system" in general and "judicial law" in particular. This editorialsuggests a specific research collaboration between the judiciary and legal researchers. This collaboration will be carried out through thematic qualitative analysis to identify and promote predominant and strong judicial policies. We will explain how thematic qualitative analysis can be used to identify and promote these predominant and strong judicial policies and how this research can serve as a powerful companion to programs designed and implemented to prevent the multiplicity of judicial policies. For more explanation, the Iranian judicial system is wide in scale and has high capacity in depth. By the width of the system, we mean numerous stages and judicial authorities, such as the prosecutor's office, first and second-class criminal courts, Civil courts, Family courts, some specialized courts, the Court of Appeals, the Supreme Court, quasi-judicial commissions, the Administrative Justice Court, etc.