Journal of Research and Development in Comparative Law

Journal of Research and Development in Comparative Law

Waiving Resolutory Condition; Criticism and Analysis of Judicial Precedent with Comparative Insights from French and English Law

Document Type : scientific research paper

Authors
1 Professor, Department of Private and Islamic Law, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Private Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran
3 Master's student in Private Law, Faculty of Law, University of Judicial Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Waiving Resolutory Condition; Criticism and Analysis of Judicial Precedent with Comparative Insights from French and English Law
The article explores the feasibility of waiving a resolutory condition through judicial review and a comparative examination between the legal systems of France and England using a descriptive-analytic research method to achieve uniformity in judicial precedent between the courts. The primary question is, after fulfilling the resolutory condition, is the contract valid just by the parties’ agreement to waive the condition and remain of the contract? Is the contract reinstated? Could the Beneficiary (the person in whose favor a condition) waive a resolutory condition by himself and therefore, prevent the termination of the contract and reinstating the contract? The nature of the resolutory condition and its consequences on the contract, the dependence of the termination condition on the will of the person in whose favor a condition is made before and after the fulfillment of the condition has been examined. The most important impediment to the fulfillment of the resolutory condition has been reviewed, It was concluded that before the fulfillment of the condition, the parties’ agreement to waive the condition is valid, as Could the person in whose favor a condition is made waive a resolutory condition by himself. Also, the parties’ express or implied agreement to waive the termination and maintain the contract is reputable even after fulfillment of the resolutory condition, as the will of the person in whose favor a condition is made to bind a contract and not invoke its termination, will be sufficient for reinstating the contract. Thereupon, the jurisprudence shall avoid unnecessary termination of many contracts by considering the results acquired by the article.
Keywords: Resolutory Condition, Waive (Withdraw), Nature of the Condition, Suspension, Applying to Termination (Dissolution of Contract), Restoration of the Non-Existent, Constructive Subjects.
Keywords

Subjects


  1. References

    1. Amini, M., Pishnamaz, S. A., Bahrami, E. (2022). Judicial Intervention in Value Equilibrium based on economic analysis of consideration; A Solution to Deviate from Monopoly of Termination. Islamic Law Research. 23(2): 231-262. [In Persian]
    2. Basri Bahrani, M. A. (1992). Kalimat al-Taqwa (Vol. 4, 3rd ed.). Qom: Islamic Publications Office. [In Arabic]
    3. Batteur, A. (Dir.). (2024). Droit civil des obligations: Méthodologie & sujets corrigés. Lefebvre Dalloz. [In French]
    4. Beatson, J., Burrows, A., & Cartwright, J. (Eds.). (2023). Anson's Law of Contract (31st ed.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
    5. Behjat, M. T. (2002). Wasilat al-Najat (2nd). Qom: Shaf. [In Arabic]
    6. Bojnourdi, S. H. (2017). Al-Qawa‘id al-Fiqhiyyah (Vol. 4, 4th ). Qom: Dalil-e Ma. [In Arabic]
    7. Caron, C. (2000). La clause résolutoire en droit français». Revue de la Faculté de droit de Sfax, 70-89. [In French]
    8. Chitsazian, M., Soltani-Fard, J. (2023). A Jurisprudential and Legal Study of the Feasibility of Referring to and Deviating (Udoul) from the Contract Termination. Fiqh. 30(115), 7-39. [In Persian]
    9. Chitty, J., & Beale, H. G. (2023). Chitty on contracts (35th ed.). vol.1. London, England: Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters.
    10. Court Decision No. 140009390008670759, issued on 3 November 2021, General Civil Court, Branch 1, Golpayegan. [In Persian]
    11. Court Decision No. 140009390011285496, issued on 2 January 2022, Court of Appeals, Branch 13, Isfahan Province [In Persian].
    12. Court Decision No. 14004139002273589, issued on 15 March 2022, General Civil Court, Branch 10, Yasuj. [In Persian]
    13. Court Decision No. 140068390017982468, issued on 26 February 2022, Court of Appeals, Branch 50, Tehran Province. [In Persian]
    14. Court Decision No. 140103390001966609, issued on 18 August 2023, General Civil Court, Branch 9, Gorgan. [In Persian]
    15. Court Decision No. 140135390007877308, issued on 21 February 2023, General Civil Court, Branch 3, Maku. [In Persian]
    16. Court Decision No. 140147390008740895, issued on 8 January 2023, General Civil Court, Branch 3, Amol. [In Persian]
    17. Court Decision No. 140168390008582375, issued on 14 September 2022, General Civil Court, Branch 126, Tehran. [In Persian]
    18. Court Decision No. 140225390012411320, issued on 24 December 2023, Court of Appeals, Branch 19, Razavi Khorasan Province. [In Persian]
    19. Court Decision No. 140228390002760510, issued on 16 October 2023, Court of Appeals, Branch 9, Hamedan Province. [In Persian]
    20. Court Decision No. 140235390004549166, issued on 11 October 2023, Court of Appeals, Branch 19, West Azerbaijan Province .[In Persian]
    21. Court Decision No. 140240390001719731, issued on 19 September 2023, Court of Appeals, Branch 9, Hormozgan Province. [In Persian]
    22. Court Decision No. 140268390009161594, issued on 18 September 2023, Court of Appeals, Branch 17, Tehran Province. [In Persian]
    23. Court Decision No. 140268390016768191, issued on 20 January 2024, General Civil Court, Branch 20, Tehran. [In Persian]
    24. Court Decision No. 140291390001963413, issued on 14 May 2023, General Civil Court, Branch 3, Rudhen. [In Persian]
    25. Court Decision No. 140368390000667373, issued on 16 April 2024, Court of Appeals, Branch 61, Tehran Province. [In Persian]
    26. Court Decision No. 9109980228300864, issued on 21 December 2015, Court of Appeals, Branch 15, Tehran Province. [In Persian]
    27. Court Decision No. 9209970222701355, issued on 28 December 2013, Court of Appeals, Branch 27, Tehran Province. [In Persian]
    28. Court Decision No. 9209980213201192, issued on 31 May 2015, Court of Appeals, Branch 25, Tehran Province. [In Persian]
    29. Court Decision No. 9209980231300142, issued on 6 April 2015, Court of Appeals, Branch 46, Tehran Province. [In Persian]
    30. Court Decision No. 9209982161800721, issued on 19 August 2015, Court of Appeals, Branch 32, Tehran Province. [In Persian]
    31. Court Decision No. 9309970221200161, issued on 18 May 2014, Court of Appeals, Branch 12, Tehran Province. [In Persian]
    32. Court Decision No. 9309970908300103, issued on 18 May 2014, Supreme Court, Branch 23, Iran. [In Persian]
    33. Court Decision No. 9409970220801188, issued on 13 February 2016, Court of Appeals, Branch 8, Tehran Province. [In Persian]
    34. Court Decision No. 9409970221001187, issued on 30 December 2015, Court of Appeals, Branch 10, Tehran Province. [In Persian]
    35. Court Decision No. 9409970221800904, issued on 11 November 2015, Court of Appeals, Branch 18, Tehran Province. [In Persian]
    36. Court Decision No. 9409970269400753, issued on 18 October 2015, Court of Appeals, Branch 51, Tehran Province. [In Persian]
    37. Court Decision No. 9409972160300245, issued on 5 July 2015, General Civil Court, Branch 38, Tehran. [In Persian]
    38. Court Decision No. 9509970224400281, issued on 15 June 2016, Court of Appeals, Branch 44, Tehran Province. [In Persian]
    39. Court Decision No. 9809970242301420, issued on 4 November 2019, General Civil Court, Branch 126, Tehran. [In Persian]
    40. Emami, S. H. (2006). Civil Law(26th). Vol. 1. Tehran: Islamieh. [In Persian]
    41. Esmaeili, M., Narimanpour, M. (2021). A Critique of the Theory of Withdrawal from Contract Termination. Islamic Law. 18(71), 55-78. [In Persian]
    42. Ghura’i Esfahani, M. H. (2010). Hashiyat al-Makasib (Vol. 1, 2nd ed.). Qom: Dhawi al-Qurba. [In Arabic]
    43. Haeri (Shah Bagh), S. A. (2020). Annotated Civil Code of Iran (5th). Tehran: Ganj-e Danesh [In Persian].
    44. Hakim, S. M. (1990). Minhaj al-Salihin (Vol. 2). Beirut: Dar al-Ta‘aruf Publications. [In Arabic]
    45. Harati, M. (2023). Resolutive condition in the new French civil law and the ‎legal and judicial restrictions on its application from the ‎perspective of Iranian law. Comparative Legal Studies. 14(1), 563-582. [In Persian]
    46. Jafari Langroudi, M. J. (2023). General Philosophy of Law Based on the Principle of Pragmatism: Theory of Equilibrium (6th). Tehran: Ganj-e Danesh. [In Persian]
    47. Karimi, A., Bahrampouri, R. (2016). The Retroactive Effect of Termination with a Comparative Study in French Law. In A Chapter from Hajj’s Thoughts: Commemoration of Martyr Nasser Ghorbannia. [In Persian]
    48. Karimi, A., Javaherkalam, M. H. (2014). The Logical Relationship between No Loss Principle in Islamic Jurisprudence and the Principle of Abuse of Rights in Western Legal Systems. Comparative Research in Islamic and Western Law, 1(2). 135-165. [In Persian]
    49. Karimi, A., Javaherkalam, M. H. (2021). Developing a Jurisprudential Principle for Silence as an Expression of Will. Fiqh Ahl al-Bayt (a.s.), 25(98). 64-94. [In Persian]
    50. Karimi, A., Karimi, S. (2022). New Thoughts on Contract Law (2nd). Tehran: Dadgostar. [In Persian]
    51. Kashif al-Ghita, J. (n.d.). Kashf al-Ghita ‘an Mubhamat al-Shari‘ah al-Ghara. Isfahan: Mahdavi. [In Arabic]
    52. Kashif al-Ghita, M. H. (2002). Tahrir al-Majallah (Vol. 1). Qom: Al-Majma‘ al-‘Alami li-Taqrib Bayn al-Madhahib al-Islamiyyah. [In Arabic]
    53. Katouzian, N. (2008). General Rules of Contracts (3): Effects of the Contract (5th). Tehran: Enteshar Co. [In Persian]
    54. Katouzian, N. (2014). General Rules of Contracts (5): Termination of Contract (8th). Tehran: Enteshar Co. [In Persian]
    55. Katouzian, N. (2016). General Rules of Contracts (1): Concept, Formation, and Validity of Contract (13th). Tehran: Enteshar Co. [In Persian]
    56. Khomeini, S. R. (1972). Tahrir al-Wasilah (Vol. 1, 3rd ed.). Qom: The Institute for Compilation and Publication of Imam Khomeini's Works. [In Arabic]
    57. Khui, S. A. (1413 AH). Misbah al-Fiqhah (al-Makasib), arranged by M. A. Tohidi (Vol. 2). Qom: Madinat al-Ilm.
    58. Le Gallou, C., & Marmisse-d’Abbadie d’Arrast, A. (Eds.). (2019). Le contrat dans tous ses États (1–). Toulouse, France: Presses de l’Université Toulouse Capitole, Librairie générale de droit et de jurisprudence. [In French]
    59. Malaurie, P., Aynès, L., & Stoufflet, J. (2016). Droit des obligations (8e éd. à jour au 1er août 2016). LGDJ Lextenso.
    60. Milani, S. M. H. (2008). Kitab al-Bay‘ (Vol. 4). Qom: Center for Islamic Truths. [In Arabic]
    61. Mirshakari, A. (2017). Practical Treatise on Contract Law (Vol. 1, 1st). Tehran: Enteshar Co. [In Persian]
    62. Mohaqqeq Damad, S. M. (2016). General Theory of Conditions and Obligations in Islamic Law (Vol. 1, 4th ). Tehran: Center for Islamic Sciences. [In Persian]
    63. Mohaqqeq Damad, S. M. (2019). Jurisprudential Rules of Civil Law (Vol. 2, 12th). Tehran: Center for Islamic Sciences. [In Persian]
    64. Najafi, M. H. (1985). Jawahir al-Kalam (Vol. 27, 7th ed.). Beirut: Dar Ihya al-Turath al-Arabi. [In Arabic]
    65. Poelmans, O. (2013). Droit des obligations au Luxembourg. Primento. [In French]
    66. Porchy-Simon, S. (2021). Droit civil: 2e année, les obligations (9e éd.). Paris, France: Dalloz. [In French]
    67. Prépa Dalloz. (2016). Droit des obligations – Tome I (Édition 2016). SuPPorT De Cour – Examen Du CRFPA. Paris, France: Dalloz. [In French]
    68. Renault-Brahinsky, C. (2008). Droit des obligations: apprendre,utile. (8e éd). Gualino. [In French]
    69. Renault-Brahinsky, C. (2020). L'essentiel des grands arrêts du droit des obligations: 2020-2021: 80 fiches d'arrêts avec propositions de plans de commentaire. Gualino. [In French]
    70. Rouhani, S. (2014). Fiqh al-Sadiq (a.s.) (Vols. 15, 18, & 20, 5th ed.). Qom: Ayin-e Danesh. [In Arabic]
    71. Sabzevari, M. B. (2002). Kifayat al-Ahkam (Vol. 1). Qom: Islamic Publications Office. [In Arabic]
    72. Sabzevari, S. A. (1994). Muhadhdhab al-Ahkam fi Bayan al-Halal wa al-Haram (Vol. 18, 4th ed.). Qom: Sayyid Abdul Ala Sabzevari. [In Arabic]
    73. Sadeghi Moghaddam, M. H., Saatchi, A., Javaherkalam, M. H. (2015). The Role of Option Rights in Contract Rescission. Civil Jurisprudential Doctrines. 7(12), 3-18. [In Persian]
    74. Safaei, S. H. (2019). New ideas in "theory of equilibrium" and its comparison with some French theories. Research and Development in Comparative Law. 2(5), 305-347. [In Persian]
    75. Safaei, S. H. (2021). Introductory Course on Civil Law: General Rules of Contracts (35th). Tehran: Mizan. [In Persian]
    76. Safaei, S. H., Javaherkalam, M. H. (2021). Civil Law (2): Will, Inheritance, and Pre-emption (2nd). Tehran: Enteshar Co. [In Persian]
    77. Safaei, S. H., Javaherkalam, M. H. (2023). Advanced Civil Law (2): Representation and Trust (2nd). Tehran: Enteshar Co. [In Persian]
    78. Shahidi, M. (2018). Civil Law (4): Conditions within the Contract (6th). Tehran: Majd. [In Persian]
    79. Shahidi, M. (2019). Civil Law (5): Discharge of Obligations (13th). Tehran: Majd. [In Persian]
    80. Sistani, S. A. (2002). Minhaj al-Salihin (Vol. 2, 5th ed.). Qom: Office of His Eminence. [In Arabic]
    81. Stone, R., & Devenney, J. (2018). The modern law of contract (Twelfth edition). Routledge.
    82. Tabataba’i Qomi, S. T. (2007). Mabani Minhaj al-Salihin (Vol. 8). Qom: Qalam al-Sharq. [In Arabic]
    83. Tabataba’i Yazdi, S. M. K. (1995). Takmilat al-‘Urwat al-Wuthqa (Vol. 2). Qom: Davari. [In Arabic]
    84. Tabataba’i Yazdi, S. M. K. (1996). Su’al wa Jawab (Q&A). Tehran: Islamic Sciences Publishing Center. [In Arabic]
    85. Terré, F., Lequette, Y., & Gaudemet, S. (2019). Droit civil: Les successions, Les libéralités. Paris, France: Dalloz. [In French]
    86. Treitel, G. H. (1988). Remedies for Breach of Contract: A Comparative Account. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
    87. Treitel, G. H. (2003). The Law of Contract (11th ed.). Oxford, England: Thomson Reuters.