The response to juvenile delinquency is one of the ways to recognize the level of development of the criminal justice system in any legal system, in such a way that sensitivity in this category, in addition to providing the grounds for correction and treatment, is considered a kind of penal savings, in the light of which today's juvenile delinquent will become normative citizens of society in the not-so-distant future, which ultimately, ignoring modern response patterns and 111failing to implement them will lead to failure in this field. This research, which was developed using a descriptive-analytical method, aims to identify new patterns of response with a comparative approach in the legal systems of England and Iran after dispelling some of the ambiguities in the issues, and then concludes: The benefit pattern; the minimal intervention model; the restorative justice model; the risk management model (collectively known as general models) and then under the estimated response pattern; the use of media; new rehabilitation method; implementation of disabling the criminal model and implementation of the tendency of criminals to follow socially acceptable norm, and then, under the restorative response pattern; Response by the local community and response by accountability, rehabilitation and reintegration (collectively known as the special pattern), are considered as criminal response models to juvenile delinquency in a new model in English law. Whereas in Iranian law, general patterns have been largely accepted in regard to crimes subject to ta'zir, special patterns have not been recognized and paid attention to.