فصلنامه تحقیق و توسعه در حقوق تطبیقی

فصلنامه تحقیق و توسعه در حقوق تطبیقی

Examining Instances of Surprising Contractual Terms and the Approach of International Commercial Documents

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان
Seyed Sina Salimi 1
Zahra Sohrabi Abad 2
1 Master Student in Faculty of Law and Political Sciences, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran
2 PhD Student in Faculty of law (Civil Law Section), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
10.22034/law.2024.2026824.1329
چکیده
Surprising terms are those drafted contrary to the Obligor’s legitimate, normal, and reasonable expectations, which no ordinary person in the position of the accepting party could expect their existence of such terms in the contract. This is because the content, language, or manner of presenting these terms is generally overlooked by the other contracting party, who becomes bound to all the provisions by signing the contract while unaware of the surprising terms contained therein. This article explains the nature, instances, and criteria for identifying surprising contractual terms and aims to answer the following question by analyzing the legal status of these terms from the perspective of international commercial documents: Does the mere apparent acceptance and signing of the contract by the Obligor commits them to these terms? The findings of this study suggest that international commercial documents adopt a similar approach in this regard.
The UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts have deemed invalid surprising terms incorporated in standard contracts with a feature the other party could not reasonably have expected and were not expressly accepted by the Obligor. Similarly, based on the Principles of European Contract Law, contractual terms that have not been individually negotiated are only admissible against a party who was unaware of them if the citing party took reasonable steps to bring those terms to the other party's attention prior to or at the time of contract formation. The mere inclusion of such terms in the contract text, even if signed by the other party, is insufficient to bind the Obligor to the obligations arising from those terms.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Contractual Terms
Surprising
Unexpected
Unfair
Apparent Intent
Actual Intent
Standard Contract

موضوعات

References
Akhlaghi. B, Emam. F. (2006). Principles of International Commercial Contracts. Tehran. Iran: The SD institute of Law, Research & Study (In Persian)
Arab Ahmadi.. MR, Al-Lesan. M, Noshadi. I. (2015). Marine International Electronic Bill of Lading and Its Functions. Islamic Law Journal. 12(46). 139-163 (In Persian)
Arbabi. M, Hatamipour. N. (2019). Reference In a Bill of Lading to a Charterparty: Seeking Intention of the Parties. Comparative Law Review. 10(1). 1-20 (In Persian)
Ayres.I, Schwartz. A. (2014). The No-Reading Problem in Consumer Contract Law. Faculty Scholarship Series. 66. 545- 610. 
Ben-Shaha. O. (2008). The Myth of the Opportunity to Read in Contract Law. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1162922 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1162922. 1-28
Common European Sales Law
Eskini. R, Niazi Shahraki. R. (2009). The concept of the principle of good faith and fair treatment. Legal Journal of Govah. (10). 3-21 (In Persian)
Hajjar Kargar. H, Hasani. A, Khajezadeh. A. (2022). Unfair Terms in Banking Contracts and Their Conflict with the Goals of the Interest-Free Banking System. Sceintific Journal of Islamic Economic. 22(87). 127-157 (In Persian)
Jafarpour. K. (2005). Good faith in international trade. Journal of Law and Politics. 1(3). 141-174 (In Persian)
Karimi. A, Esfandiarifar. Kh. (2019). Unfair Terms in the Air Transportation Contracts. Private Law Studies Quarterly. 48(4). 723-742 (In Persian)
Khatibi. M. (2021). Investigating the jurisprudential effects on the customer's ignorance of the provisions of banking contracts. Sceintific Journal of Islamic Economic. 21(82). 101-127 (In Persian)
Khueini. Gh, Salmanzadeh. J. (2016). A study on legal nature of codeshare agreements in air transportation. Journal of studies in Islamic Law & Jurisprudence. 8(14). 59-95 (In Persian)
Lando. O. (2007). IS Good Faith an Over – Arching General Clause in the Principles of European Contract Law?. European Review of Private Law. 15(6). 841-853.
Malakuti. R, (2024). Legal validity of the Terms and Obligations contained in the flight Ticket. ًQuarterly Journal of Interdiscplinary Jurisprudences Studies. (15). 21-33 (In Persian)
Principles of European Contract Law 2002
Sardouei Nasab. M, Kazempour. SJ. (2011). Elements of Contractual Unconscionablity. The Judiciarys Law Journal. 75(75). 37-73 (In Persian)
Shiravi. A. (2021). International Trade Law. Tehran. Iran: Samt Publications (In Persian)
Shoarian. E, Torabi. E. (2010). Principles of European Contract Law and Iranian Law (Comparative Study). Tabriz. Iran: Forouzesh Publications (In Persian)
Taghizadeh. E, Ahmadi. A.)2015). Unfair Terms in Iranian Law in View of Article “46” of Iranian Electronic Commerce Act. Journal of Private Law Research. 3(10). 9-42 ( In Persian)
Tilden Rent-A-Car Co. v. Clendenning, 1978, Ontario Court of Appeal, CanLII 1446 (ON CA), Available at : https://canlii.ca/t/g1bxl 
Uber Technologies Inc. v. Heller. D. 2021, Supreme Court of Canada, 38544, https://www.scc-csc.ca/case-dossier/cb/2020/38534-eng.aspx .
Unidroit Principles of International Commercial Contracts 2016
Zaki. A, (1998), Comparative study of the principle of disregarding objections to commercial documents (In Iranian and French Law). Master's Thesis, Imam Sadiq University. Tehran. Iran (In Persian)
Zulhafiz. W. M. (2017). Allocation of Risk in the Oil and Gas contracts in Malaysia: An Empirical Study.Society of interdisciplinary Business Research . 6(1). 1-48
Zulhafiz. W. M. (2017). On the contractual risk allocation in oil and gas project. The Law Review. Presented at the "15th Management in construction Researchers". 168-193
 
فصلنامه تحقیق و توسعه در حقوق تطبیقی
دوره 7، شماره 22 - شماره پیاپی 22
تابستان 1403
صفحه 163-186